This particular smear must be written by someone who cannot read, someone who is at the very least an oxymoron if not a complete moron.
Every year there is a national conference at which voting members (members who have at least two years continuous membership) can vote on changes to the party constitution.
The Chairman brings a resolution of his own and the remainder come from the regions with each regional organiser deciding which of the ideas from the members in their region will be put forward.
The Chairman can see his resolution overturned and he may see changes take place that he may not like. That would be tough then wouldn’t it!
The leadership of the Chairman can be challenged as well so Nick Griffin is not Chair for life.
This sounds quite democratic to me.
