Posts
According to an article on the British National Party website: - Third World Colonisers on Dole Refuse to Work in Olympic Village, Official Figures Show.
Third World origin colonisers, who now make vast numbers of unemployed in the five boroughs around the 2012 Olympic Village site in London, have been identified as refusing to get off the dole to work on the project.
According to the Olympic Development Authority (ODA), which is in charge of construction work, unemployed ‘locals’ in the boroughs — which include Newham and Tower Hamlets — have refused to even apply for the jobs.
As a result, the ODA has employed some 225,000 foreigners to do the work so that the project can be completed in time.
Even Labour MP Frank Field described the situation as “225,000 causes for shame.” He did, of course, fail to point out that the jobs had all been advertised in immigrant heavy areas, and joined in the totally unjustified slander against native indigenous British workers by adding that “People come from all over the globe to work in the Olympic boroughs — yet we can’t get locals into work.”
If you thought that the article above was bad enough then enjoy this next one, again from the BNP website: - EU Prepares Path to Flood Europe with Millions of Third Worlders
The European Union will on Wednesday this coming week formally launch its plans to flood all of Europe with millions of Third World immigrants in terms of a new “joint EU resettlement programme.”
The plan, to be announced by the European Commission, has as a first phase, the “resettlement programme” under which nations would take in “more refugees from poor and war-hit third countries.”
The next phase will be to “coordinate Europe’s response” to the tsunami of invaders from Africa and the Middle East.
I am certain that to all of you labour and Conservative fucknuts out there this is fine. Just in case you are unaware you do not speak for me.
Agreeing with the British national Party though not being brave enough to say so because the coward wants to keep his job is this reporter from the Telegraph in his article: - At this rate, life in Britain will be one big squash
Last week's figures on the projection for Britain's population heartened Phil Woolas, the Immigration Minister. "The public can be confident that immigration is under control," he insisted. And yet Britain's population increased by 408,000 last year, and a significant portion was due to the higher birth rate of women who were born abroad but who have subsequently settled here. The result is that Britain's population is growing at more than triple the rate recorded during the 1980s.
That doesn't sound as if immigration is under control, does it? Mr Woolas is encouraged by the fact that "only" 118,000 more people arrived in the UK than left, a 44 per cent fall in the rate of "net immigration" (the number of people who arrive, minus the number who leave).
But there are many reasons to believe that last year's fall in net migration will be reversed the moment Britain's economy improves – and even if that doesn't happen, the difference in birth rates between those arriving and departing means that the population will still increase by nine million over the next 20 years.
Even the projected population of 70 million people by 2028, most of whom will be in the South East (where the jobs are), is not a particularly enticing prospect. Yet no one in the Government is planning to do anything to stop it happening.
And that is not because no one cares about it. I am increasingly convinced that many ministers worry about it a great deal, not least because they have woken up to the fact that the electorate is very concerned about it.
The trouble is that ministers have not the slightest idea of what they could do that would be effective. One of the most common ways in which non-UK citizens gain the right to settle here is "family reunion", especially spousal reunion – relatives from overseas coming to join those who have settled here.
That right is protected by the European Convention, and a modest attempt by the Government to restrict it was struck down by the Law Lords last year.
It is a shame that the journalist from the telegraph did not have the necessary decency to name check us as the only political party in Britain with the policies to tackle this problem.
