Posts
Having read Tom Gower’s excellent piece on White Slavery in Modern Day Britain I was reminded of the driving fear that many Nationalists quite rightly have for the future of these nations not necessarily for our own generation but for our descendents. This nation has changed in many ways since I was younger, many of them for the better, as is the way of nations. Development is continual and is achieved through change. I know of no-one who would reinstate the law which made homosexuality illegal for example.
Nationalists do not tend to hanker for some rose tinted vision of a past that never existed rather we wish to take our place within a secure nation that respects the freedoms of its people to enjoy and develop their cultural identity inside a democratic framework. My fear for the future is not driven by political changes that I disagree with. Disagreement with policy decisions would make me change my voting pattern but little else.
The force that drove me into politics is the conviction I hold that the forces which bind together the people of the nations that constitute the United Kingdom are being slowly and entirely by design torn apart. Scattered to the wind as a boiler man discards unwanted ash.
Left unopposed the great centralization of the European Union and its apparently Marxist motivated masters who clearly seek to deny any notion of respect for nationhood will control the populations of the former independent nation states as completely and with as little regard for their individual wishes and needs as did the politburo of the old USSR. Communism believed in control of the masses by means of complete state ownership and the maxim, which was a lie, that all are equal. That combined with the real fear of persecution from within by the mechanism of the state police was enough to quell the populations of the former iron curtain countries for years. They did overcome their fears and as dictator and communist party fell, only remaining by force and prospect of change in Russia itself, the people entrusted western style democracies with their future.
The Socialists of the left in this and other countries believe in control of the people just as much as did the Communists but they realised that control of the people through the democratic rule of law and the manipulation of information to promote their own agenda and drive public opinion though harder to achieve would be a more effective form of control than their Communist forebears had managed. If you can get the people to believe that what you are doing is right then you can get away with anything. The development of social control mechanisms such as the various equality organisations and development of perceived sub-classes of people such as chavs and the classification of dissenters as racists are part of this scheme. The disaffected working classes have to be controlled one way or another and if you forego the apparatus of physical harm then you have to have the social control through fear of being branded as unacceptable.
The frequent visitations of Socialist political leaders from this country who held high office to Russia are something that I have seen reported many times. Though not recently as since Communism now fails to control its population to anything like the degree that it formerly did the Socialists probably think that the visitations should now be in entirely the opposite direction.
No period in history can be drawn as a parallel to the condition that the world has been in throughout the past decades. The world has grown effectively smaller due to the invention of the jet engine. International transportation of goods has been entirely radicalised by the invention of the cargo container and the ships which so cost effectively drive the globalisation of trade. Liberalised banking would not have been possible without the development of computer and the internet. Industrialisation of countries indeed continents which hitherto had relied mainly upon an agricultural economy and the increases of the effectiveness of modern medicine are all unique to this point in history and all contributing factors to the parlous state that we find our beloved nations in.
By deregulating the credit markets asset values were sure to rise leading to economic growth and the feeling of increased wealth by the people. Year on year the value of peoples homes increased making them feel richer. Feeling richer and with ever more sophisticated and yet cheaper electronic goods becoming available people have taken their eye off the politicians.
The very political establishment that has realigned itself while they were not looking to believe in open borders, freedom of movement for people and capital making us and our assets effectively slaves to the politicians and their bankers. If you do not believe this why do you think that western nations have spent unspeakable amounts of money propping up private companies through the mechanism of quantitative easing with even the USA undertaking one of the largest nationalisation processes in history? If we had not the international capitalists would have deserted us and our national economies would have collapsed for certain.
Globalisation has achieved continually low prices by constantly moving on the the next source of cheap labour.
The good times for globalists are over. The third world nations will no longer accept their exploitation status and quite rightly so. There are no longer any areas of the world with populations waiting to be exploited, they already have been. Workers of the world are organising for a better deal for themselves as indeed they should which lowers the difference between the price of producing goods abroad and the price of producing them here. There is still a long way to go and shipping is still cheap but even that will not last for ever.
Capital is less available than it once was, peak oil will slowly put an end to cheap transport and many other things as well. Wars over natural resources will become more common as overpopulation increases and cultures that do not protect themselves will disappear forever.
With unrestrained movement of capital and people the future of the indigenous peoples of these lands does not look very bright. There are those amongst you who undoubtedly think that the differences will not be that great for those who are around at the time for we will all certainly be dead by the time I am looking at.
I would offer Egypt as an example. Once a Christian nation it is now 90% Muslim and renamed, as can clearly be seen if you look at the address of the embassy on the Foreign Office website as the Arab Republic of Egypt. The remaining Christians within Egypt do not have a good time of it and face continuous persecution as this article from the Washington Post demonstrates. There is much more evidence available if you are interested enough to do a googlemooch on it.
If the indigenous peoples of the United Kingdom do not attain recognition as such then we will be replaced. It is as simple as that. Now that the British National Party has enough clout politically to not be totally ignored anymore we hear that a cross party panel of MP’s (they are obviously afraid of one party breaking ranks at this time which is all it would take for their system to fall apart) has agreed that ‘balanced migration’ is the answer. This fallacy simply means replacing the population that is leaving with an equal number of immigrants and has no benefit to us what so ever.
It is my belief that only through a robust defence of the four pillars of Nationalism will we survive. I believe that only the British National Party can be trusted to do this work. Even if it did occur that the main Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat parties changed their published policies along Nationalist principles I would not trust them as far as I could throw the house of commons. Once they had our votes they would u-turn faster than a competent skateboarder.
Trust only the British National Party!
