Posts
All Comments
This special report was sponsored by Nick Griffin MEP into the causes of the flooding which devastated Cumbria causing the loss of life of a policeman, widespread property damage, evacuation of hundreds of people and I am sure a life changing experience for many more.
Initially the mainstream media were straight onto the ‘climate change’ bandwagon. This report shows that globalist capitalism may be the real cause.
Credit where it is due there is no moss on our Nick. Here he is commenting upon the setting of the new European Union budget.
He makes a good point too!
Last night we watched all of the debate below and it made such a refreshing change to see a British National Party spokesperson, in this case our Chairman Nick Griffin, given the opportunity to take part in a sensible debate.
I am grateful to the Christian Party spokesperson for taking part and in particular to the ‘Genesis TV’ station for hosting the debate. I had not heard of this channel before I must admit but I do admire their dedication to free speech and democracy. The combined length of the debate is approximately one and a half hours but if you are interested it is a good watch.
In past elections the Christian Party has distributed leaflets slating the BNP and asking the question, “Would you vote for the Cross or the Swastika?” It is nice to see their spokesperson apologize for this and admit that they were wrong to do it in the first place.
Some of the moments contained in these clips are real gems. I will leave you to find them for yourselves.
To the left we have Ian Huntley. Convicted of the multiple murder of children. There is absolutely no doubt what so ever that this man committed the crime that he is in prison for. Not for the first time I read in online editions of newspapers that he has been attacked in prison. This time apparently someone cut his throat.
This story should not be in the press. This story should not be in the press because as a multiple child killer he should have been hung for his crimes. Right of appeal, yes. Should any/all new evidence be considered, damn right. If there was any doubt at all that this may not be the man responsible I would say no to the noose.
This is not the story of child killers. This is the story of an adult with a history of sexual convictions that society has tried to help before. This is a man who arguably has something wrong with him. A man who cannot be trusted in public again and does not deserve another chance after committing these crimes.
Liberals would keep him in prison for ever because they cannot agree to take a life. They use the emotional argument that this act would make society as bad as him. Well I have some news for them. People like this come from society. They are nurtured by society, hold their place in it, learn their place in the world, know what is frowned upon and commit evil acts anyway.
If he is just evil then he should be hung. If there is something so wrong with him that his acts seem reasonable then he should be hung. I cannot imagine a worse fate than to commit acts like his and then realise afterwards the enormity of the crime that he himself has committed and to be confined with that knowledge for life. That would be torture and the shame for it would lie on the liberal souls in whose name it is committed.
The man on the left is Weyman Bennett and has the distinction of being leader of the Unite Against Fascism organisation. Though the title of this particular organisation is laudable enough the reality of its operation is anything but. I shall continue with a quote from an article about this event on the British National Party website.
I encourage you all to read the full article on the BNP website for more details.
The extremist leftist UAF street thugs — who are officially endorsed by the Lib Dem, Labour and Tory parties — have been condemned by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) as seeking “violent confrontation” with the “sole intention [of] creating disorder” after yesterday’s shocking scenes in Bolton.
UAF secretary Weyman Bennett, who is also a central committee member of the ultra-left extremist Socialist Workers’ Party, was arrested and charged with conspiracy to organise violent disorder after his UAF gangsters attacked police and passersby.
The UAF is officially endorsed by the leader of the Conservative Party, David Cameron; Labour MP and long-time violent street activist Labour MP Peter Hain; Keith Vaz MP (head of the Labour Party’s “Black Socialist Society”); expenses swindler Harry Cohen MP; and Lib Dem MEP Chris Davies, amongst many other MPs from all three parliamentary parties.
All of these politicians are formally signed-up supporters of the UAF and their names appear prominently on that organisation’s founding charter.
On a more personal note I have, in common with many party members, come across these people before.
These are the lengths that the police had to go to to protect groups of families who were attending the Red, White and Blue Family Festival last year.
I took this picture with a mobile ‘phone from the drivers window of our people carrier. The Socialist Workers Party banner can be clearly seen behind the mounted policeman.
Intimidation tactics will never work with the British National Party. The same however cannot be said of the general public.
I would love to advertise the location of a BNP meeting in the local press for all to see. If we did then one of the left wing (often trades union financed) rabbles (the UAF is only one of them) whose sole purpose is to work against the development of the British National Party, would try to intimidate the owner of the venue into cancelling the booking. If the meeting was allowed to go ahead it would only do so with jeering protesters outside carrying slogan laden banners equating us with Fascism.
Though there are many reasonable minded members of the public who would like to attend one of our meetings to have a look no member of the public will ignore that kind of welcome outside.
Despite these anti democratic groups campaigning against us with their lies the British National Party is growing both in membership and electoral influence.
There is no reason to think
that this will not continue!
In the run up to the General Election it is good to see that at least the British National Party has the British people at its heart.
“Would you like a double dip discombobulation Sir?”
“Oh yes please, er … does that come with ice cream?”
Oh if only it did!
I have seen so much about the chances, possibilities and effects of a double dip recession that the only way you could get me to read anything else about it now would be with an ice cream bribe.
As a layman I have been interested in and read about the economy now for years and years. The definition of who has more power, the politicians or the bankers, has never been more blurred. Once taken for granted as being the politicians most people are probably not sure these days after the coming of institutions that are too big to be allowed to fail and the realisation that up to seventy five percent of the British economy is financial services based.
Sterling, the humble pound in your pocket, is not the bedrock of respectability that it once was either. The US Dollar is the defacto trade currency in most international reserves and the Euro, love it or loathe it, is the new contender as an international currency of reserve and trade. Certainly the Iranian announcement a few years ago that they were to cease using the Dollar and use the Euro instead for reserve and trade purposes did more to dent their relationship with the US than any technological program ever has. The US economy stands because of its unique global position on the financial stage.
What is next for the UK in the recession. Is it over? Economists stopped talking about green shoots a long time ago but it must end one day. Are asset prices still too high? Will the government be trusted to service its debt obligations and therefore not lose its AAA rating? Will this be a double dip recession?
All interesting questions and all answerable if you bear a couple of things in mind. Firstly that all economies are globally intertwined and especially one such as ours because we have always been a great trading nation. Secondly that repeating recent mistakes for political purposes does not help.
The UK recession is as bad as it is because of vastly over inflated asset prices (houses, offices, retail developments, share prices, bonds, gilts), unregulated financial markets that rewarded short-term greed on an unprecedented scale and thereby led to the creation of the most complicated set of financial instruments that have yet been devised by mankind. The manufacturing sector has been worn away by globalist policies over preceding decades to the point that take away food is now a greater part of the economy of the UK than shipbuilding. Mismanagement of the economy during times of comparative prosperity led to a burgeoning public sector that lived on debt even then and cannot possibly be maintained now.
So back to the questions. Will this be a double dip recession? Yes! Asset prices have been falsely re-inflated by the Bank of England and their gargantuan quantitative easing program which has only recently finished and which may be restarted. Post election the government deficit must be addressed. Don’t talk to me about selling the banking shares because they have gone down in value twenty five percent since we bought them. The public sector spending and the public sector pensions deficit has to be addressed and sharply. Taxes will have to rise one way or another and the European Union is quite happy to be bringing in their own direct taxation sooner or later on carbon trading/energies (all fuels to you and me) which will stifle any recovery when it does come. This will slow down the important retail sector once again and bring back stories of insolvency and personal debt to the front pages.
Will the UK maintain its AAA rating and how will Sterling be affected? The thing to remember here is that we are in a bad way financially as a nation but so are lots of others. Currencies are seen in relation to those around them so though the value of Sterling will continue on its downward trend for a while before bottoming out while we work our way through the debt pile I cannot see it dropping off a cliff as some predict. The UK has a mature and diverse economy which though I as a Nationalist would like to change a few things for the benefit of the people I recognise its longevity. The AAA rating is in little danger unless the next government does little or nothing with our monstrous debt position in which case the International Monetary Fund will be called in a month after the General Election.
So I believe that the double dip is laid out ahead of us and the side dish of discombobulation comes with the roadmap for the way ahead.
How do the Labour and Conservative parties intend to effectively regulate the financial system? It would seem that they don’t which brings us back to the base point for part of the original problem. Talk about recent history repeating itself.
How are they going to deal with the credit system, personal and governmental, and when will they start? Neither party seems to know which should lead many to concern and hopefully lead them to seek an alternative Nationalist viewpoint.
In the mean time, pass me that ice cream!
Our Nick needs no introduction from me and neither does he need me to explain his point of view. He continues to do that very well himself.
Enjoy!
Cameron of the Conservatives is showing himself up as being contemptuously condescending with his display of the Conservative gay candidates list. I am certain that the very purpose of equal rights is that groups of people are treated the same and no-one cares about their differences.
Clearly Cameron does. This intellectually inebriated display of showboating with his ‘rainbow’ dozen openly gay MP’s does nothing to further equality. Rather it acts as a patronising prelude to whichever group Cameron wishes to hold the flame of publicity to next.
I am not one for predictions but we have seen groups of women, gay; lesbian (and transgender?) as well as ethnic minority candidates prioritised already so it must be the turn of the disabled. I strongly suggest that any members of the Conservative party confined to wheelchairs should confine themselves indoors should Cameron venture into their constituency. The thought of dodgy Dave slaloming hapless Harold from Haversham through the portals of Westminster for a publicity shoot is not one that I care to hang on to. Even less one that I should care to write a ‘elf an’ safety risk assessment for.
There is no substitute for policies in a General Election campaign and therein lies the rub. The dossier on dodgy Dave is empty. The whiplash from the last u-turn on the economy has left him incapable of navigating his way to number ten.
I am not personally convinced that he wants the job anyway. Possibly better for him if Labour win and preside over the double dip + direct euro taxation which will consign the economy to basket case status. Preening at stage left would suit him nicely whilst Blairites torture Brown in the prelude to his abandonment by his myopic New Labour project. Emerging to oversee the surgical removal of Socialism from British politics for decades as the left fractures and writhes its way into obscurity. Nascent Conservatism erupting to save the day. Emerging that is if he too has not been replaced by someone with the ruthlessness necessary to win an election.
When I get any news as to why this project has been allowed to take place without any consultation I will update you all via this blog.
Last Friday a serious accident took place involving a child on Greenmoor Road, Nuneaton.
This is my call for the Highways Authority at Warwickshire County Council to give the highest priority to surveying this stretch of road to ensure the safety of the community.
At the last Full Council meeting where the budget setting was understandably the main event there were some smaller items on the agenda. One of the latter of these was the allocation of committee places to political parties according to the amount of representation that they have in chamber. There variations on how this is done in different authorities but at Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council we have a formula which has been in place for years and is adhered to. The BNP councillor was allocated three committee places.
It is understandable that the controlling Conservative group allocate which party will have how many spaces per committee and they also make certain that they maintain a majority on each committee. They did win an election after all.
Since being elected on 1st May 2008 I have maintained a virtually 100% attendance record across my committees, in fact it is 100% on most of them, and have contributed at every meeting. Being one who reads the agenda in advance it still does not cease to amaze me when someone (usually a conservative) has to quickly skim through each item on the agenda as they arise.
Before Christmas I was approached by Peter Gilbert, current leader of Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, in a corridor and asked if I wanted to remain on the same committee’s. I indicated that I was perfectly happy where I was.
I am fully trained on the various committee’s and have enjoyed taking part in them. I have volunteered for several working groups, much to the distaste of Labour who do not want me to be on any, and enjoyed being able to provide input at a level whereby work done will be presented as a report to cabinet and ultimately become debatable in chamber.
I will not pretend to be surprised to have been moved. In Social Scrutiny in particular I have been keen that the role of Scrutiny be developed whereby scrutiny is performed in advance on items of particular importance and not remain a retrospective exercise as it is at the moment. On standards committee it must irritate some that the British National Party councillor gets to sit in judgement of them at the initial stage on assessment panels. I know it does I have heard them raising their voice in the past to say so loudly enough that I can hear while I am passing. My presence on Appeals does not seem to have caused any fuss.
My new committee's are:
I have sought training and will be up to speed as soon as possible. Those readers who know me will be aware that not only do I always have something to say but the strategy of removal to take me off the boil is doomed to failure.
I intend not only to seek training from the officers of the council. Oh no. As it happens I have rather a good relationship with some BNP councillor’s from other authorities who sit on these very committee’s. I am arranging to nip across an pick up some tips. Local procedures may vary by authority but the laws are the same. Advice from an experienced councillor can be invaluable to a new boy. I recognise that this change will bring forward many new opportunities for us.
Bring it on!
Primary school teachers are by and large female. This has been the case for a long time. The times they are a changing and according to a story in the Daily Express:
THE number of men applying to be primary school teachers has rocketed during the economic downturn.
Education has turned into a boom industry with a 52 per cent increase in male applicants wanting to teach four to 11 year olds over the past year.
Figures from the Training and Development Agency for Schools reveal how a combination of recession and redundancies has forced people to re-evaluate their career goals.
Usually men in teaching prefer to teach their particular subject rather than take on the general education focus of the earlier Key Stage curriculum.
Personally I think that this change is a good thing. An increase in positive male role models in primary schools will bring about a change in behaviour for the better.
I have seen in a couple of papers that men are changing their focus or reviewing their career options but I am having none of it. I think that these men are well qualified and fear for their future where they are and see teaching as a potentially well paid public sector alternative to the dole queue.
Every cloud brings a silver lining and I will of course be as delighted as everyone else to see the economy develop but while times are tough I welcome this change in the provision of education.
I strongly recommend that you read the Canadian website MACLEANS.CA and their story: The absurd trial of Geert Wilders before continuing.
According to NewsOK: Victorious Dutch anti-Islam politician back in UK
LONDON (AP) — Fresh off a local election victory in the Netherlands, Dutch anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders is returning to Britain, seizing the media spotlight and stirring up protest.
Wilders is due in London on Friday to show his anti-Islam film "Fitna," a 15-minute short which associates the Muslim holy book, the Quran, with Islamist terror. The 46-year-old maverick, whose Freedom Party is on the rise in the Netherlands, will present the movie at London's House of Lords.
In his trial Geert Wilders has directly compared the Islamic Koran with a book by Hitler.
Any way that you wish to look at this case the Dutch establishment must be wishing that they had never set out on this crusade against the policies of the main opposition party leader.
Throughout my youth it has been third world nations that have resorted to taking their political opposition to court in an attempt to publicly silence them before just killing them if all else fails. Now I am not saying that the Dutch state will execute Geert, just that he has been afforded less protection than the killer of Theo Van Gough. Effectively holding their main opposition leader up in public, making certain that everyone knows exactly where he will be, and not affording him the same level of protection as those accused of other crimes. Am I the only one that thinks the Dutch state might find it convenient if Geert was knocked off?
Is this as far down the African political road as we will go in Europe or will we see further progress in this direction? Free speech does seem to be a victim of crime in the UK at the moment because of politically correctness. I know that I am not the only person who believes that Dr Kelly did not commit suicide.
It is better to allow oppositions to speak freely so that the people can judge for themselves rather than have the state judge the opposition, allowing the accused great public sympathy and thereby, leaving the way open for the people to sympathize with the formerly accused at the polling stations.
Well folks it has happened at last. Now we will find out just how powerful the institutions of the European Union are when it comes to interfering with our domestic political matters.
The Council of Europe requires the dissolution of the British National Party
02/03/2010 - 17h08
STRASBOURG (Novopress): The success in the United Kingdom by the British National Party (BNP) in the European elections of June 2009 is unpalatable to the Council of Europe.With 6.2% of votes, the BNP, led by Nick Griffin (the cons), had two members who have joined the European Parliament, the Alliance of European national movements (AMNE) comprising elected representatives of the National Front and those of Hungarian Jobbik.
But in a report released this afternoon by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), Council of Europe "greatly concerned" that the election of two members, together with structuring "substantial local support bases in certain regions," the BNP offers a forum, "which could lead to the development of overtly racist British society."
Consequently, ECRI calls on the UK "to take steps to rectify the exploitation of racism in politics" and said that according to its General Policy Recommendation No. 7 adopted in December 2002, "Law should be possible to dissolve organizations that promote racism. "In clear: the United Kingdom adopted emergency legislation allowing him to dissolve the BNP, one of whose slogans is:" British Jobs for British Workers ".
Chaired by a Latvian Nils Muiznieks, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) has members from 47 countries comprising the Council of Europe (including Turkey).
Interesting times indeed. I am not interested in the general hullaballoo that will be raised in the media. I am interested in the legal ramifications of this. Is this particular body even allowed to make such a call on a member nation?
Personally I doubt it but we will see.
Anjem Choudary explains in his own words and in full knowledge that he is being interviewed about the meaning of the word ‘Islam’.
The report goes on to provide an insight into the beliefs of this particular Muslim community leader and his adherents.
Dispatches documentary Britain's Islamic Republic showed how the Labour Party has been infiltrated from within.
This is pretty damning stuff. If it can happen in Tower Hamlets then it has to be valid to ask the question, “Where else?”
The news that the Labour party who control the council at Tower Hamlets in East London has been infiltrated by an Islamist element attached to the idea of Islam For Europe, as claimed by one of their own in newspapers recently, should not be too much of a surprise.
Remember Militant Labour? Look at the harm they did back in their day. Opponents of Labour should hope for something similar. The potential for media coverage now that the cat is out of the bag is obviously multiplied now that the Labour group has been taken into special measures by the regional Labour party.
The race and equality industry, prevalent in London beyond anything seen in the rest of the country, could go into overdrive with this. Only time will tell.
Rumblings about such replacement has been rumoured by deselected Labour councillors in other parts of the country ‘through the grapevine’ but such gossip is almost certainly based upon rancour at being replaced by a new candidate. Maybe it was just time.
I am not going to pretend to care one way or the other. If this is beginning to occur elsewhere the Labour Party deserves it. If not they need to be aware of the possibility. It is easier to take over an existing political party, once you have the necessary population in an area, than it is to form a new one from scratch. There is a lot more to it than people think.
I do believe that there is more to this than meets the eye. I am cynical but the Labour party with its diversity pledges wants to do this in the eye of the media coming up to a General Election? I do not think so.
For a party that believes deeply in multiculturalism, that encourages diversity and loves Islam it comes as a surprise to me that they object to the take over of the Labour group by the local Muslim population.
Institutional racism in the Labour party maybe.
At the beginning of the year I said that one of the improvements that I intended to make to this blog this year was that I would start to use YouTube clips on some of the posts. Here is the first one.
At the recent full council meeting I voted against the controlling Conservative administration budget. This is one of the reasons why.
As councillor for Barpool Ward on Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council I owe the residents a duty to ensure that the council tax that they pay is used appropriately. In my view this is not appropriate.
