The Telegraph article above shows us that the European Union has now banned criticism of the European Union. In fact they have gone further than that and banned any comment which tarnishes the image of the European Union.
That makes well over half of the blogs/websites that I look at illegal and I include this one amongst that number. Such an erosion of civil liberty is a return to the communist/fascist politics of the early twentieth century when criticism of the state meant punishment from whichever of the above regimes held a choke hold over your nation. Liberty loving Britain was exempt then because we fought tyranny together. These days our own politicians are complicit in this anti-crusade against free speech.
So what comes next and what can we do aboit it?
RFID devices under the skin might be a start, maybe using children in care as test subjects to 'protect' them. Maybe repeat offenders could be added to the list as a step to making us all living databases. And you thought ID cards were an extreme measure. The public did not bat an eyelid when it emerged that dna samples from babies heal prick tests have been stored for years, therefore providing the state with a steadily growing dna database. Privacy issues are going to be massive in the future, certainly within ten years time, and it would be nice to see Nationalists getting infront of the curve on this as we did with peak oil and the bursting of the false asset bubble which created the falsely labelled 'credit crunch'. Neither of which we made enough of. How can there be a credit supply problem when credit is created at the stroke of a keyboard. Your lives are being controlled people! Wake up and accept the fact.
The challenge for Nationalists is to lead the fightback because no-one else can. The other political philosophies are inextricably tied to the doctrine of federal expansionism and the sacrifice of something that literally millions have died to protect is a price that ultimately they are prepared to make you pay. The international increase in social capital achieved by perverting whatever it takes to achieve it will be seen as reason enough. There will be a lot of noise made in terms of political disagreement to deceive public opinion and civil protests in capital cities to make the electorate feel that everything possible is being done. Nationalists are going to have to broaden their public appeal by campaigning on new fertile ground. Why tell the public for the umpteenth time that we oppose immigration and multiculturalism when every single person of voting age has no doubt on that at all. We need to scream out loud about privacy issues, how to fix the economy, reform the education and health services, and make the justice system fit for purpose. There is much to do and we must start now. Delay will mean failure and though this will upset some the term indigenous has to be left behind. The only way to make a nation fit to live in is to make it so for all of the people that have the right to live there, otherwise inequalities and civil unrest will result which somewhat defeats the object. As issues go privacy issues and being seen defending free speech are excellent places to start.