I believe that in communities across the nation the topic of community cohesion is going to be big for the next decade at least. The resultant lack of social cohesion between ethnic and cultural groups who have been encouraged to ramp up their differences under the now defunct Marxist theory of multiculturalism is backfiring and nobody wants to talk about it. Actually doing something about it would mean admitting responsibility for the mess in the first place so no one else wants to take the lead. With care, necessarily more for us than other parties because of the amount of smears that have been targeted against us, the British National Party can show that Nationalism is a cohesive force unlike the divisive Socialist system that we seek to replace.
Islam is a religion that sets out the way in which its followers are expected to lead their lives. This is far more proscriptive than Christianity and covers areas of life that Christians would refer to as either personal choice or politics.
This prayer point issued by the Barnabus Fund summed up the problem rather well:
Pray for our brothers and sisters in Saudi Arabia, one of the most difficult places in the world in which to follow Christ. All public expressions of the Christian faith are illegal, and people can even be arrested for meeting to pray and worship together in private homes.
Most Christians in Saudi Arabia are expatriates, and the treatment they receive if caught practising Christianity varies according to where they come from. Westerners are treated less harshly than Asians or Africans. But the most vulnerable of all are Saudi Christians, who are all converts from Islam to Christianity; they could even be executed for apostasy.
Thankfully we do not face this as our day to day reality and never will. I am absolutely convinced that we can break through the layers of smears aimed exclusively at us if we not only recognise the cohesion problems associated with multiculturalism but propose viable solutions.
If you are wondering what on earth I am on about or wondering why this could be worth the work ask yourself the following question: How many people have I spoken to in the last twelve months that broadly agreed with British National Party policy but have nothing to do with us either actively or in the polling booth because of ‘the perception of what the BNP is really about’.
Anyone who is active in real life, unlike the many internet warriors who have no value what so ever to the party, will recognise the problem that I have laid out in the question contained in the paragraph above.
Now even with the changes to the membership criteria of the British National Party we will have no Islamic members at all because Islamic beliefs are totally contrary to the principles of Nationalism. By definition a Muslim who joins the Nationalist movement is no longer a Muslim. As you have read above; apostasy is not encouraged.
The major problem highlighted by the question is that the public has been encouraged resolutely by our political opponents to see Nationalism as being as radical as the more extreme overseas preachers of Islam. Those who believe that merely changing the party chairman will change this are unrealistic to say the least. Our political opponents will beat us mercilessly with this blunt instrument marked up as ‘extremist’ for as long as we allow this treatment to continue.
A viable community cohesion strategy that we could point to I believe would go some way to providing an effective answer and allaying many groundless fears. If this does not prove to be the case it need cost us nothing in either financial or ideological terms.
The content of the website of the Commission on Integration and Cohesion is under revue due to the recent change in government. It will be interesting to see what it contains when it is re-launched. The Nationalist community is unlikely to admire the new content any more than the old but with a rewrite to suit our aspirations I am certain that we can achieve a strategy that is acceptable to the electorate and therefore an ideal defence against the blunt instrument marked “extremist”.